Most guys, rather a lot of guys have a tendency of categorizing girls or chicks, if you will, the moment they see them.
“She’s the dating type” , “She’s the one-night-stand type”, “She’s marriage material” and various other somewhat crude and unrefined categories and adjectives depending upon how hot/pretty/plain-jane the girl is, how much within or out of his range the guy thinks she is and most importantly, how well he knows her.
I have often been amused at such categorization and ( I’m somewhat embarrassed to admit) occassionaly indulged in it.
There is also some subconscious economic rationale behind this categorization.
A spectacularly beautiful (sic) 25 year old girl posts a question on Craigslist seeking to know how she should go about her objective of getting married to a guy who makes atleast half a million dollars a year. She goes on to wonder why much plainer looking women are married to really wealthy guys.
The question itself is hilarious, but the answer is totally ROTFL stuff. An excerpt.. “in economic terms you are a depreciating asset and I am an earning asset.”
The funniest thing I’ve read all day. Read the complete thing here.
yea…i’d got this mail as well…
and i WAS crazily hilarious!
[...] tip]Kapeesh « A Great Collection of Calvin and Hobbes strips Here Comes [...]
That’s not F***ing funny at all. You men always assume the pretty girl is just some dumb bimbo to play around with. And you find that funny? Did you ever think that a pretty girl could be smart too? What a crass and distasteful “joke”. You yourself are the joke.